Benchmark · v0.1 preview

VPN Privacy Benchmark.

An evidence-graded comparison of VPN providers, scored against the 28-criteria Evidence Quality Score (EQS) methodology. Every claim backed by a record. No affiliate weighting.

v0.1 · 24 May 20263,469 records38 providers28 criteria · 7 groups

What this is — and isn't

v0.1 is a preview cut — 10 providers, publicly verifiable facts only (jurisdiction, audit auditor and year, court-tested incidents). It is intentionally narrow.

v0.2 will be the full dataset — 38 providers, all 28 criteria with EQS component scores, published as a versioned CSV/JSON on GitHub alongside an arXiv preprint of the methodology paper. Subscribe via contact for the release notice.

Per-record evidence lives on TheVPNMatrix, which renders all 3,469 underlying records with their EQS components. This page is the academic-framing index; TheVPNMatrix is the operational database.

Benchmark · v0.1

Top providers, publicly verifiable facts.

Full data on TheVPNMatrix
ProviderJurisdictionLatest auditCourt-testedNotes
Mullvad
Sweden
Assured AB · 2023
Infrastructure
Yes — 2023 Swedish police raid yielded no user data (no-account model)Accepts cash, no email required, RAM-only serversRecords
ProtonVPN
Switzerland
Securitum · 2022
App + infrastructure
Limited — IP logging required only under Swiss court order with specific subjectOpen-source apps across all platforms, transparency reportRecords
ExpressVPN
British Virgin Islands
KPMG · 2022
TrustedServer (RAM-only) infrastructure
Yes — 2017 Turkish authorities seized servers, no user data recoveredAcquired by Kape Technologies 2021Records
NordVPN
Panama
PwC Switzerland · 2022
No-logs policy + infrastructure
Partial — 2018 Finland datacenter breach disclosed publicly in 2019Repeated independent audits since 2018Records
IVPN
Gibraltar
Cure53 · 2022
Apps + backend
None publicRemoved affiliate program 2022, transparency report quarterlyRecords
Surfshark
Netherlands
Deloitte · 2023
No-logs policy
None publicRe-incorporated from BVI to Netherlands 2021, merged with Nord Security 2022Records
TunnelBear
Canada
Cure53 · 2023
Apps + backend (annual since 2016)
None publicOwned by McAfee since 2018, one of first VPNs to commit to annual public auditsRecords
Private Internet Access
United States
Deloitte · 2022
No-logs server configuration
Yes — 2016 FBI subpoena and 2017 grand jury produced no user dataOwned by Kape Technologies, source code publicRecords
Windscribe
CanadaNo comprehensive public auditYes — 2022 Ukrainian server seizure produced no user dataStrong transparency reports, generous free tierRecords
CyberGhost
Romania
Deloitte · 2022
No-logs policy
None publicOwned by Kape Technologies since 2017, quarterly transparency reportsRecords

Listed alphabetically by provider · scoring bands held until v0.2 dataset import · all facts citable on TheVPNMatrix

How EQS works

Eight components, range −6 to 23.

The Evidence Quality Score (EQS) sums Type, Grade, Source Quality, Independence, Scope, Reproducibility, Age, and Conflict of Interest. A perfect record scores 23; the strong band sits 14–18; anything below 8 is excluded as insufficient evidence until corroborated.

EQS = Type + Grade + SQS + Ind + Scp + Rep + Age + COI

Dataset roadmap

v0.2 — full dataset, GitHub-versioned, arXiv preprint.

38 providers · 28 criteria · 3,469 evidence records · open CSV/JSON with semantic versioning · CHANGELOG · methodology preprint on arXiv (cs.CR).

Notice of v0.2 dataset publication goes out via the Substack